Skip to content

docs: require Playground reproductions for issues - #1286

Merged
fireairforce merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
zoomdong/require-playground-repro
Sep 20, 2026
Merged

fireairforce merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
zoomdong/require-playground-repro

Conversation

@fireairforce

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

Require a Playground reproduction URL when opening a utoo-lint issue. Add an issue form with required reproduction, steps, expected behavior, and actual behavior fields, and disable blank issues.

Document how to create and verify a minimal Share URL with a concrete engine version, provide additional CLI/filesystem reproduction details, and verify a released fix before closing the issue. Link the process from the README. The form requires a non-empty URL field; link validity is checked during triage.

Test Plan

  • Parsed both issue template YAML files and verified the required reproduction field, unique field IDs, and disabled blank issues.
  • git diff --cached --check passed before committing.
  • Documentation and issue-template changes only; no runtime code changed.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 20, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-20T10:50:28.292071Z e7bcbdb PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@fireairforce
fireairforce merged commit 9a90490 into main Sep 20, 2026
3 checks passed

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: e7bcbdb308

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread CONTRIBUTING.md
Comment on lines +14 to +15
3. Select a concrete **Version** instead of `latest` so the reproduction stays
tied to the engine version you tested.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Preserve pinned Playground versions for issue links

A concrete ?version= does not keep a reproduction tied to that engine indefinitely: scripts/stage-playground-wasm.mjs publishes only the newest ten releases and removes older WASM files, while initialLintVersion silently selects latest when the requested version is no longer in the manifest. After ten subsequent releases, an old issue link will therefore run a different engine while retaining its stale version parameter, potentially hiding or changing the reported bug. Retain pinned releases or make unavailable versions fail explicitly rather than promising durable version-specific reproductions.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant