Skip to content

Many boards share a common set of features, yet each board has its own define #246

Description

@sylefeb

The example projects tend to be built for boards, using board-specific defines (ICEBREAKER, ULX3S) while many boards share a common FPGA and feature set (ice40, ecp5, etc.). Often only the pinout/clock differ.

Should we get a more fine grained define system? This could be the opportunity to also get an improved (consistent) PLL system and revise/cleanup the pinout names...

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions