Is this only for validation? #1042

Activity

1. xucian

   changed the title [-]Is this only for validation[/-] [+]Is this only for validation?[/+] on Feb 5, 2023
2. mdavis-xyz commented on Feb 13, 2023

   

   mdavis-xyz

   on Feb 13, 2023

   More actions

   I'm not the maintainer, but my guess is the answer is no.

   How do you generate a schema from json? You can't tell whether the fields present are optional. Or perhaps an enum of types.
3. xucian commented on Feb 13, 2023

   

   xucian

   on Feb 13, 2023 via email

   Author

   More actions

   It's just for the bulk of it, the result is manually changed after. This would be a huge time saver, especially for large jsons

   …

   On Mon, Feb 13, 2023, 02:38 Matthew Davis ***@***.***> wrote: I'm not the maintainer, but my guess is the answer is no. How do you generate a schema from json? You can't tell whether the fields present are optional. Or perhaps an enum of types. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1042 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABLM3FZGAUY3XN3DWLJFZT3WXF7BFANCNFSM6AAAAAAURUPPHA> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>
4. python-jsonschema

   locked and limited conversation to collaborators on Feb 13, 2023
5. Julian

   converted this issue into a discussion #1046 on Feb 13, 2023