[2287] Adding extra phase for transition from sata to virtio - #2293
[2287] Adding extra phase for transition from sata to virtio#2293meghansh-pf9 wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
🚨 Security Vulnerability SummarySecurity posture degraded 📊 Overall Changes
🔍 Detailed Breakdown📦 Gosec (Static Analysis)
📦 Trivy (Dependency Scan)
📋 Baseline Methods
🚨 Added VulnerabilitiesTrivy (Dependencies) - 4 AddedTarget: Target: Target: Target: Only HIGH and CRITICAL severity vulnerabilities are tracked |
f6883a1 to
4876a51
Compare
✅ Security Vulnerability SummaryNo change in security posture 📊 Overall Changes
🔍 Detailed Breakdown📦 Gosec (Static Analysis)
📦 Trivy (Dependency Scan)
📋 Baseline Methods
Only HIGH and CRITICAL severity vulnerabilities are tracked |
What this PR does / why we need it
Answering the LDM boot gate with "Move to virtio" left the migration reporting
WaitingForLDMBootSuccessfor the entire rebuild, sostatus.phaseclaimed anoperator action was outstanding while the VM was actually being stopped, deleted
and recreated. The UI showed no progress for it.
Adds a
PromotingToVirtiophase covering that window.LDMGateHoldsPhasebecomesLDMHeldPhaseand returns which phase is held rather than just whether one is —same label-first logic, it simply stops collapsing the two states into one.
Surfaced as work in progress rather than a gate: "Moving to virtio" with a progress
panel, spinner instead of the pause icon, an informational banner, and no action
button. Also included in the table's active-phase set, the sidenav, and the detail
page's polling window so the rebuild keeps refreshing.
fixes #2287
Testing Done