Skip to content

Adding Engineering Fundamental part 2 - #4

Merged
Ellerbach merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
add-ef-02
Nov 4, 2026
Merged

Ellerbach merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
add-ef-02

Conversation

@Ellerbach

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

Adding Engineering Fundamental part 2

Motivation and Context

  • Adding Engineering Fundamental part 2

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots

Types of changes

  • Improvement (non-breaking change that improves a feature, code or algorithm)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue with code or algorithm)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality to code)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Config and build (change in the configuration and build system, has no impact on code or features)
  • Dependencies (update dependencies and changes associated, has no impact on code or features)
  • Unit Tests (add new Unit Test(s) or improved existing one(s), has no impact on code or features)
  • Documentation (changes or updates in the documentation, has no impact on code or features)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project (only if there are changes in source code).
  • My changes require an update to the documentation (there are changes that require the docs website to be updated).
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly (the changes require an update on the docs in this repo).
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have tested everything locally and all new and existing tests passed (only if there are changes in source code).
  • I have added new tests to cover my changes.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 4, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Explain Change →

Warning

Review limit reached

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

Next included review available in 51 minutes.

Check out review usage here.

View limit details

Limit details: You’ve used the included review currently available.

Learn how review limits work.

Review configuration:

Run configuration
  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: Central YAML; Path: .coderabbit.yaml
  • Review profile: ASSERTIVE
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: e4776b73-37cb-4086-87a1-d9829dac8ebb
Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e11b842 and dcee153.

Files selected for processing: 1
  • src/content/blog/embedded-development-shouldn-t-mean-starting-from-scratch/index.md

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.

Summary

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added a guide to .NET nanoFramework development workflows in Visual Studio and VS Code, including firmware flashing with nanoff and project support for stable v1 and Preview v2.
    • The guide explains Preview firmware requirements and library compatibility, and covers Copilot Chat assistance, reusable Markdown instructions, native-development containers and platform images, setup limitations, and testing on physical hardware.

The pull request adds a blog post about .NET nanoFramework developer tooling. It describes editor workflows, project support and constraints, Copilot guidance, native-development dev containers, setup requirements, and hardware testing.

Changes: .NET nanoFramework developer tooling

Layer / File(s) Summary
Managed-code workflows and project support
src/content/blog/embedded-development-shouldn-t-mean-starting-from-scratch/index.md
The article describes Visual Studio and VS Code workflows, nanoff firmware flashing, and stable and Preview project support and constraints.
Copilot guidance
src/content/blog/embedded-development-shouldn-t-mean-starting-from-scratch/index.md
The article covers the VS Code extension’s Copilot Chat agent and reusable Markdown instructions, including the agent guidance’s stated v1 limitations.
Native-development environments
src/content/blog/embedded-development-shouldn-t-mean-starting-from-scratch/index.md
The article describes dev-container images, Dockerfiles, selected-target smoke tests, setup requirements, real-hardware testing, and developer feedback loops.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Change: Other

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers: josesimoes

Merge Risk: Minimal · previous review e11b8

No concrete merge-blocking issue was found in the documentation change.

Pre-merge checks: Passed 4
Check name Status Explanation
Title check Passed The title identifies the addition of the second Engineering Fundamental documentation part. It is concise, under 50 characters, contains no issue references, and does not end with a full stop.
Description check Passed The description identifies the change as documentation for Engineering Fundamental part 2 and marks it as a documentation change. It is related to the changeset.
Linked Issues check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share
Recent review info
Run configuration
  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: Central YAML; Path: .coderabbit.yaml
  • Review profile: ASSERTIVE
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: a163965d-66dc-479f-8da1-35ee327d34d1
Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 23c448f and e11b842.

Files selected for processing: 1
  • src/content/blog/embedded-development-shouldn-t-mean-starting-from-scratch/index.md

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Nov 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Static Web Apps: Your stage site is ready! Visit it here: https://ashy-pond-09bf9d41e-4.westus2.3.azurestaticapps.net

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Nov 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Static Web Apps: Your stage site is ready! Visit it here: https://ashy-pond-09bf9d41e-4.westus2.3.azurestaticapps.net

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Nov 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Azure Static Web Apps: Your stage site is ready! Visit it here: https://ashy-pond-09bf9d41e-4.westus2.3.azurestaticapps.net

@Ellerbach
Ellerbach merged commit b40680d into main Nov 4, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants