Repository navigation
Conversation
Contributor
|
|
account.account is shared between the parent company and its branches, so toggling "Allow Reconciliation" on the checks suspense account has to recompute the stored issue_state of every check on that account. The search ran without sudo and the record rule of the check left out the branches the user has not enabled, so their issue_state — the field that decides whether the check shows as issued or debited — was left desynchronized.
cav-adhoc
force-pushed
the
19.0-t-72542-cav
branch
from
October 5, 2026 17:23
8df0ce5 to
5fab94b
Compare
Contributor
|
@roboadhoc r+ nobump |
roboadhoc
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2026
account.account is shared between the parent company and its branches, so toggling "Allow Reconciliation" on the checks suspense account has to recompute the stored issue_state of every check on that account. The search ran without sudo and the record rule of the check left out the branches the user has not enabled, so their issue_state — the field that decides whether the check shows as issued or debited — was left desynchronized. closes #1180 Signed-off-by: rov-adhoc <rov@adhoc.com.ar>
roboadhoc
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2026
account.account is shared between the parent company and its branches, so toggling "Allow Reconciliation" on the checks suspense account has to recompute the stored issue_state of every check on that account. The search ran without sudo and the record rule of the check left out the branches the user has not enabled, so their issue_state — the field that decides whether the check shows as issued or debited — was left desynchronized. closes #1180 Signed-off-by: rov-adhoc <rov@adhoc.com.ar>
This branch was previously deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Parte del review de multicompañía / branches de
l10n_latam_check_ux(tarea 72542, subtarea de la 72037).Qué corrige
Al tocar "Permitir conciliación" en una cuenta compartida por el árbol de compañías, el recálculo del
issue_statealmacenado se salteaba los cheques de las branches que el usuario no tenía habilitadas y los dejaba desincronizados. Ahora elsearchessudo: es un recálculo técnico, no una consulta del usuario.models/account_account.py