[Renovate] Update npm security fixes [SECURITY] [LOW] - #134
Open
appsec-renovate-bot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
appsec-renovate-bot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
appsec-renovate-bot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
appsec-renovate-bot
Bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-security-fixes
branch
4 times, most recently
from
September 4, 2026 06:15
c326470 to
770063f
Compare
appsec-renovate-bot
Bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-security-fixes
branch
5 times, most recently
from
September 11, 2026 06:14
95338b6 to
c3de67c
Compare
appsec-renovate-bot
Bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-security-fixes
branch
4 times, most recently
from
September 18, 2026 06:15
f651f68 to
bcd16d5
Compare
appsec-renovate-bot
Bot
force-pushed
the
renovate/npm-security-fixes
branch
from
September 19, 2026 06:15
bcd16d5 to
3acb015
Compare
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains the following updates:
7.14.5→7.29.64.17.1→4.20.03.14.1→3.15.23.14.1→3.15.22.0.0→2.0.45.0.0→5.3.4@babel/core: Arbitrary File Read via sourceMappingURL Comment
CVE-2026-49356 / GHSA-4x5r-pxfx-6jf8
More information
Details
Impact
Using
@babel/coreto compile maliciously crafted code can allow ab attacker to read any source map from the system that is running Babel, if these conditions are all true:Users that only compile trusted code are not impacted.
Patches
The vulnerability has been fixed in
@babel/core@7.29.6and@babel/core@8.0.0-rc.6.Workarounds
Callers can mitigate the issue without upgrading by setting
inputSourceMap: falsein their Babel options.Callers can also manually extract the
#sourceMappingURLcomment from the input source code, validate whether the source map that it links to is allowed to be read, and if it is pass an object toinputSourceMap(passingfalsewhen it's not).Credits
Thanks Teodor-Cristian Radoi for reporting the vulnerability.
Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:NReferences
This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
@babel/core: Arbitrary File Read via sourceMappingURL Comment
CVE-2026-49356 / GHSA-4x5r-pxfx-6jf8
More information
Details
Impact
Using
@babel/coreto compile maliciously crafted code can allow ab attacker to read any source map from the system that is running Babel, if these conditions are all true:Users that only compile trusted code are not impacted.
Patches
The vulnerability has been fixed in
@babel/core@7.29.6and@babel/core@8.0.0-rc.6.Workarounds
Callers can mitigate the issue without upgrading by setting
inputSourceMap: falsein their Babel options.Callers can also manually extract the
#sourceMappingURLcomment from the input source code, validate whether the source map that it links to is allowed to be read, and if it is pass an object toinputSourceMap(passingfalsewhen it's not).Credits
Thanks Teodor-Cristian Radoi for reporting the vulnerability.
Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:NReferences
This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
Express.js Open Redirect in malformed URLs
CVE-2024-29041 / GHSA-rv95-896h-c2vc
More information
Details
Impact
Versions of Express.js prior to 4.19.2 and pre-release alpha and beta versions before 5.0.0-beta.3 are affected by an open redirect vulnerability using malformed URLs.
When a user of Express performs a redirect using a user-provided URL Express performs an encode using
encodeurlon the contents before passing it to thelocationheader. This can cause malformed URLs to be evaluated in unexpected ways by common redirect allow list implementations in Express applications, leading to an Open Redirect via bypass of a properly implemented allow list.The main method impacted is
res.location()but this is also called from withinres.redirect().Patches
expressjs/express@0867302
expressjs/express@0b74695
An initial fix went out with
express@4.19.0, we then patched a feature regression in4.19.1and added improved handling for the bypass in4.19.2.Workarounds
The fix for this involves pre-parsing the url string with either
require('node:url').parseornew URL. These are steps you can take on your own before passing the user input string tores.locationorres.redirect.Resources
https://github.com/expressjs/express/pull/5539
https://github.com/koajs/koa/issues/1800
https://expressjs.com/en/4x/api.html#res.location
Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:NReferences
This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
express vulnerable to XSS via response.redirect()
CVE-2024-43796 / GHSA-qw6h-vgh9-j6wx
More information
Details
Impact
In express <4.20.0, passing untrusted user input - even after sanitizing it - to
response.redirect()may execute untrusted codePatches
this issue is patched in express 4.20.0
Workarounds
users are encouraged to upgrade to the patched version of express, but otherwise can workaround this issue by making sure any untrusted inputs are safe, ideally by validating them against an explicit allowlist
Details
successful exploitation of this vector requires the following:
Severity
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:LReferences
This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
Express.js Open Redirect in malformed URLs
CVE-2024-29041 / GHSA-rv95-896h-c2vc
More information
Details
Impact
Versions of Express.js prior to 4.19.2 and pre-release alpha and beta versions before 5.0.0-beta.3 are affected by an open redirect vulnerability using malformed URLs.
When a user of Express performs a redirect using a user-provided URL Express performs an encode using
encodeurlon the contents before passing it to thelocationheader. This can cause malformed URLs to be evaluated in unexpected ways by common redirect allow list implementations in Express applications, leading to an Open Redirect via bypass of a properly implemented allow list.The main method impacted is
res.location()but this is also called from withinres.redirect().Patches
expressjs/express@0867302
expressjs/express@0b74695
An initial fix went out with
express@4.19.0, we then patched a feature regression in4.19.1and added improved handling for the bypass in4.19.2.Workarounds
The fix for this involves pre-parsing the url string with either
require('node:url').parseornew URL. These are steps you can take on your own before passing the user input string tores.locationorres.redirect.Resources
https://github.com/expressjs/express/pull/5539
https://github.com/koajs/koa/issues/1800
https://expressjs.com/en/4x/api.html#res.location
Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:NReferences
This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
express vulnerable to XSS via response.redirect()
CVE-2024-43796 / GHSA-qw6h-vgh9-j6wx
More information
Details
Impact
In express <4.20.0, passing untrusted user input - even after sanitizing it - to
response.redirect()may execute untrusted codePatches
this issue is patched in express 4.20.0
Workarounds
users are encouraged to upgrade to the patched version of express, but otherwise can workaround this issue by making sure any untrusted inputs are safe, ideally by validating them against an explicit allowlist
Details
successful exploitation of this vector requires the following:
Severity
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:LReferences
This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
js-yaml has prototype pollution in merge (<<)
CVE-2025-64718 / GHSA-mh29-5h37-fv8m
More information
Details
Impact
In js-yaml 4.1.0, 4.0.0, and 3.14.1 and below, it's possible for an attacker to modify the prototype of the result of a parsed yaml document via prototype pollution (
__proto__). All users who parse untrusted yaml documents may be impacted.Patches
Problem is patched in js-yaml 4.1.1 and 3.14.2.
Workarounds
You can protect against this kind of attack on the server by using
node --disable-proto=deleteordeno(in Deno, pollution protection is on by default).References
https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Prototype_Pollution_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html
Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:NReferences
This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
JS-YAML: Quadratic-complexity DoS in merge key handling via repeated aliases
CVE-2026-53550 / GHSA-h67p-54hq-rp68
More information
Details
Summary
A crafted YAML document can trigger algorithmic CPU exhaustion in
js-yamlmerge-key processing (<<) by repeating the same alias many times in a merge sequence.This causes quadratic parse-time behavior relative to input size and can block a Node.js worker/event loop for seconds with a relatively small payload (tens of KB), resulting in denial of service.
Details
The issue is in merge handling inside
lib/loader.js:storeMappingPair(...)iterates every element of a merge sequence when key tag istag:yaml.org,2002:merge.mergeMappings(...).mergeMappings(...)computesObject.keys(source)and performs_hasOwnProperty.call(destination, key)checks for each key.When input is of the form:
a: &a {k0:0, k1:0, ..., kK:0}
b: {<<: [*a, *a, *a, ... repeated M times ...]}
all *a entries refer to the same anchored object. After the first merge, subsequent merges are semantically no-ops, but the parser still reprocesses all keys each time.
Resulting work is O(K * M), while input size is O(K + M), giving quadratic scaling as payload grows.
Relevant code path:
lib/loader.js in storeMappingPair(...) merge branch (keyTag === 'tag:yaml.org,2002:merge')
lib/loader.js mergeMappings(...)
Root cause
File: lib/loader.js
Function: storeMappingPair(state, _result, overridableKeys, keyTag, keyNode,
valueNode, startLine, startLineStart, startPos)
Lines: ~359-366
When the merge value is a sequence (YAML 1.1 <<: [ *a, *a, ... ]), each element
is handed to mergeMappings() without deduplication. mergeMappings() then does
Every alias reference in the sequence resolves (by design) to the SAME object
via state.anchorMap. After the first merge, every subsequent merge of that same
reference is a pure no-op semantically, but still performs:
Total: M * K hasOwnProperty checks + M Object.keys allocations, while the final
object and all observable side effects are identical to a single merge.
YAML semantics for
<<:are idempotent and commutative over duplicate sources,so collapsing duplicates preserves behavior exactly; this isn't a spec trade-off.
PoC
Environment:
js-yaml version: 4.1.1
Node.js: v24.5.0
Platform: arm64 macOS (reproduced consistently)
Reproduction script:
Create many keys in one anchored map (&a).
Merge that same alias repeatedly via <<: [*a, *a, ...].
Measure parse time and compare with control payload using single merge (<<: *a).
Observed repeated runs (same machine):
K=M=1000, input 9,909 bytes: ~33–36 ms
K=M=2000, input 20,909 bytes: ~121–123 ms
K=M=4000, input 42,909 bytes: ~524–537 ms
K=M=6000, input 64,909 bytes: ~1,608–1,829 ms
K=M=8000, input 86,909 bytes: ~3,395–3,565 ms
Control (single merge, similar key counts):
K=2000: ~1–2 ms
K=4000: ~3 ms
K=8000: ~5 ms
Also verified: repeated-merge output equals single-merge output (same key count and same JSON), confirming excess time is redundant computation.
Impact
This is a denial-of-service vulnerability (CPU exhaustion / algorithmic complexity).
Any service parsing untrusted YAML with js-yaml can be impacted, including API backends, CI tools, config processors, and automation services. An attacker can submit crafted YAML to significantly increase CPU time and reduce availability.
Suggested fix:
Dedupe the merge source list by reference before invoking mergeMappings. Any of
the following are minimal and preserve YAML 1.1 merge semantics:
dedupe in storeMappingPair:
Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:LReferences
This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
js-yaml: YAML merge-key chains can force quadratic CPU consumption
CVE-2026-59869 / GHSA-52cp-r559-cp3m
More information
Details
Impact
js-yaml can spend quadratic CPU time parsing a document whose size grows only linearly. The issue is triggered by a chain of mappings where each mapping merges the previous one:
For each new mapping, the loader has to enumerate the keys inherited from the previous mapping. With N chained mappings, this results in roughly 1 + 2 + ... + N merged-key visits, i.e., O(N^2) work for O(N) input size.
PoC
From N = 4000 delay become > 1s (doc size < 100K)
Patches
Fix released. The most robust protection is to limit the total number of merged keys per parse call. This should close all past and future edge cases with merge. The default 10K-key limit should be okay in most cases.
Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HReferences
This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
JS-YAML: Quadratic CPU consumption in !!omap resolution (3.x and 4.x) — CVE-2026-59870 fix not backported
GHSA-5p4m-2wfm-xmqj
More information
Details
Quadratic CPU consumption in
!!omapresolution (js-yaml 3.x and 4.x)Summary
resolveYamlOmap()enforces key uniqueness for!!omapsequences with a linearscan (
objectKeys.indexOf(...)) inside the per-element loop, making resolutionO(n²) in the number of entries. A modestly sized YAML document therefore
consumes disproportionate CPU inside
yaml.load(), giving a denial of serviceagainst any consumer that parses untrusted YAML.
!!omapis registered in the default schema(
lib/schema/default.js→require('../type/omap')), so a plainyaml.load(untrustedInput)with no options is affected — no custom schema ornon-default configuration is required.
This is the same weakness as CVE-2026-59870 / GHSA-724g-mxrg-4qvm, which was
fixed in the 5.x line in 5.2.1. That fix was never backported: both currently
maintained legacy lines still carry the original implementation.
Affected versions
objectKeys.indexOf(pairKey)atlib/type/omap.js:29objectKeys.indexOf(pairKey)atlib/type/omap.js:30Set)Both figures are the newest release of each line at the time of writing, so
this is not a "you are on an old version" issue.
Details
lib/type/omap.js(js-yaml 4.3.0):objectKeysgrows by one element per entry, andArray.prototype.indexOfis alinear scan, so resolving an
n-entry!!omapperforms roughly1 + 2 + … + ncomparisons — quadratic inn. The work happens synchronouslyinside
yaml.load(), blocking the event loop for its whole duration.The 5.x line already solves exactly this by tracking seen keys in a
Set(
src/tag/sequence/omap.ts):Proof of concept
Measured (node v20.20.2, default heap, no flags)
js-yaml 4.3.0
js-yaml 3.15.0
Runtime grows by a factor of ~4 for each doubling of
n, which is thesignature of O(n²) (linear growth would be ~2×).
Scaling further: a 2.48 MB document with 150,000 entries blocked
yaml.load()for 10.8 seconds.Impact
Any service that parses attacker-influenced YAML with js-yaml 3.x or 4.x can be
stalled with a small input. Because the loop is synchronous, a single request
blocks the Node.js event loop and stalls every other request in the process —
so the amplification is per-process, not just per-request.
Suggested severity: consistent with CVE-2026-59870 (the same weakness in
5.x), i.e. Availability-only impact, network attack vector, no privileges or
user interaction required.
Suggested fix
Mirror the 5.x fix — replace the linear scan with a
Set:This preserves the existing duplicate-key rejection semantics exactly while
making resolution O(n). A
maxOmapLength-style cap would also work, but theSetmatches what 5.x already ships and requires no new option.References
lib/type/omap.js(3.x, 4.x) — the affected resolverlib/schema/default.js— registers!!omapin the default schemaDiscovery
Found by an automated static-analysis and executed-proof-of-concept scanner run
against js-yaml 4.2.0, then manually verified against 3.15.0 and 4.3.0 by
executing the proof of concept above. All timings in this report were measured
on the current releases of each line, not on the version originally scanned.
Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HReferences
This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
js-yaml: maxTotalMergeKeys does not limit CPU use for empty merge sources
CVE-2026-84375 / GHSA-2883-xcg3-v3hh
More information
Details
Summary
maxTotalMergeKeysdoes not count empty mappings. An attacker can repeatedly merge a large sequence of them and consume significant CPU without reaching the configured limit.Example
For every target, the loader iterates all
Nelements ofarr. This results inO(N * K)work whiletotalMergeKeysremains unchanged.PoC
Observed results:
Impact
An attacker can submit a relatively small YAML document that causes prolonged CPU consumption despite the default
maxTotalMergeKeyslimit.Fix
Count each merge-source mapping as one budget unit, in addition to counting its keys.
Difference with v5
In v3 & v4, merge is enabled by default. So, the severity score is higher.
Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HReferences
This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
js-yaml has prototype pollution in merge (<<)
CVE-2025-64718 / GHSA-mh29-5h37-fv8m
More information
Details
Impact
In js-yaml 4.1.0, 4.0.0, and 3.14.1 and below, it's possible for an attacker to modify the prototype of the result of a parsed yaml document via prototype pollution (
__proto__). All users who parse untrusted yaml documents may be impacted.Patches
Problem is patched in js-yaml 4.1.1 and 3.14.2.
Workarounds
You can protect against this kind of attack on the server by using
node --disable-proto=deleteordeno(in Deno, pollution protection is on by default).References
https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Prototype_Pollution_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html
Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:NReferences
This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
js-yaml: YAML merge-key chains can force quadratic CPU consumption
CVE-2026-59869 / GHSA-52cp-r559-cp3m
More information
Details
Impact
js-yaml can spend quadratic CPU time parsing a document whose size grows only linearly. The issue is triggered by a chain of mappings where each mapping merges the previous one:
For each new mapping, the loader has to enumerate the keys inherited from the previous mapping. With N chained mappings, this results in roughly 1 + 2 + ... + N merged-key visits, i.e., O(N^2) work for O(N) input size.
PoC
From N = 4000 delay become > 1s (doc size < 100K)
Patches
Fix released. The most robust protection is to limit the total number of merged keys per parse call. This should close all past and future edge cases with merge. The default 10K-key limit should be okay in most cases.
Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HReferences
This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
JS-YAML: Quadratic-complexity DoS in merge key handling via repeated aliases
CVE-2026-53550 / GHSA-h67p-54hq-rp68
More information
Details
Summary
A crafted YAML document can trigger algorithmic CPU exhaustion in
js-yamlmerge-key processing (<<) by repeating the same alias many times in a merge sequence.This causes quadratic parse-time behavior relative to input size and can block a Node.js worker/event loop for seconds with a relatively small payload (tens of KB), resulting in denial of service.
Details
The issue is in merge handling inside
lib/loader.js:storeMappingPair(...)iterates every element of a merge sequence when key tag istag:yaml.org,2002:merge.mergeMappings(...).mergeMappings(...)computesObject.keys(source)and performs_hasOwnProperty.call(destination, key)checks for each key.When input is of the form:
a: &a {k0:0, k1:0, ..., kK:0}
b: {<<: [*a, *a, *a, ... repeated M times ...]}
all *a entries refer to the same anchored object. After the first merge, subsequent merges are semantically no-ops, but the parser still reprocesses all keys each time.
Resulting work is O(K * M), while input size is O(K + M), giving quadratic scaling as payload grows.
Relevant code path:
lib/loader.js in storeMappingPair(...) merge branch (keyTag === 'tag:yaml.org,2002:merge')
lib/loader.js mergeMappings(...)
Root cause
File: lib/loader.js
Function: storeMappingPair(state, _result, overridableKeys, keyTag, keyNode,
valueNode, startLine, startLineStart, startPos)
Lines: ~359-366
When the merge value is a sequence (YAML 1.1 <<: [ *a, *a, ... ]), each element
is handed to mergeMappings() without deduplication. mergeMappings() then does
Every alias reference in the sequence resolves (by design) to the SAME object
via state.anchorMap. After the first merge, every subsequent merge of that same
reference is a pure no-op semantically, but still performs:
Total: M * K hasOwnProperty checks + M Object.keys allocations, while the final
object and all observable side effects are identical to a single merge.
YAML semantics for
<<:are idempotent and commutative over duplicate sources,so collapsing duplicates preserves behavior exactly; this isn't a spec trade-off.
PoC
Environment:
js-yaml version: 4.1.1
Node.js: v24.5.0
Platform: arm64 macOS (reproduced consistently)
Reproduction script:
Create many keys in one anchored map (&a).
Merge that same alias repeatedly via <<: [*a, *a, ...].
Measure parse time and compare with control payload using single merge (<<: *a).
Observed repeated runs (same machine):
K=M=1000, input 9,909 bytes: ~33–36 ms
K=M=2000, input 20,909 bytes: ~121–123 ms
K=M=4000, input 42,909 bytes: ~524–537 ms
K=M=6000, input 64,909 bytes: ~1,608–1,829 ms
K=M=8000, input 86,909 bytes: ~3,395–3,565 ms
Control (single merge, similar key counts):
K=2000: ~1–2 ms
K=4000: ~3 ms
K=8000: ~5 ms
Also verified: repeated-merge output equals single-merge output (same key count and same JSON), confirming excess time is redundant computation.
Impact
This is a denial-of-service vulnerability (CPU exhaustion / algorithmic complexity).
Any service parsing untrusted YAML with js-yaml can be impacted, including API backends, CI tools, config processors, and automation services. An attacker can submit crafted YAML to significantly increase CPU time and reduce availability.
Suggested fix:
Dedupe the merge source list by reference before invoking mergeMappings. Any of
the following are minimal and preserve YAML 1.1 merge semantics:
dedupe in storeMappingPair:
Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:LReferences
This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
JS-YAML: Quadratic CPU consumption in !!omap resolution (3.x and 4.x) — CVE-2026-59870 fix not backported
GHSA-5p4m-2wfm-xmqj
More information
Details
Quadratic CPU consumption in
!!omapresolution (js-yaml 3.x and 4.x)Summary
resolveYamlOmap()enforces key uniqueness for!!omapsequences with a linearscan (
objectKeys.indexOf(...)) inside the per-element loop, making resolutionO(n²) in the number of entries. A modestly sized YAML document therefore
consumes disproportionate CPU inside
yaml.load(), giving a denial of serviceagainst any consumer that parses untrusted YAML.
!!omapis registered in the default schema(
lib/schema/default.js→require('../type/omap')), so a plainyaml.load(untrustedInput)with no options is affected — no custom schema ornon-default configuration is required.
This is the same weakness as CVE-2026-59870 / GHSA-724g-mxrg-4qvm, which was
fixed in the 5.x line in 5.2.1. That fix was never backported: both currently
maintained legacy lines still carry the original implementation.
Affected versions
objectKeys.indexOf(pairKey)atlib/type/omap.js:29objectKeys.indexOf(pairKey)atlib/type/omap.js:30Set)Both figures are the newest release of each line at the time of writing, so
this is not a "you are on an old version" issue.
Details
lib/type/omap.js(js-yaml 4.3.0):objectKeysgrows by one element per entry, andArray.prototype.indexOfis alinear scan, so resolving an
n-entry!!omapperforms roughly1 + 2 + … + ncomparisons — quadratic inn. The work happens synchronouslyinside
yaml.load(), blocking the event loop for its whole duration.The 5.x line already solves exactly this by tracking seen keys in a
Set(
src/tag/sequence/omap.ts):Proof of concept
Measured (node v20.20.2, default heap, no flags)
js-yaml 4.3.0
js-yaml 3.15.0
Runtime grows by a factor of ~4 for each doubling of
n, which is thesignature of O(n²) (linear growth would be ~2×).
Scaling further: a 2.48 MB document with 150,000 entries blocked
yaml.load()for 10.8 seconds.Impact
Any service that parses attacker-influenced YAML with js-yaml 3.x or 4.x can be
stalled with a small input. Because the loop is synchronous, a single request
blocks the Node.js event loop and stalls every other request in the process —
so the amplification is per-process, not just per-request.
Suggested severity: consistent with CVE-2026-59870 (the same weakness in
5.x), i.e. Availability-only impact, network attack vector, no privileges or
user interaction required.
Suggested fix
Mirror the 5.x fix — replace the linear scan with a
Set:This preserves the existing duplicate-key rejection semantics exactly while
making resolution O(n). A
maxOmapLength-style cap would also work, but theSetmatches what 5.x already ships and requires no new option.References
lib/type/omap.js(3.x, 4.x) — the affected resolverlib/schema/default.js— registers!!omapin the default schemaDiscovery
Found by an automated static-analysis and executed-proof-of-concept scanner run
against js-yaml 4.2.0, then manually verified against 3.15.0 and 4.3.0 by
executing the proof of concept above. All timings in this report were measured
on the current releases of each line, not on the version originally scanned.
Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HReferences
This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
js-yaml: maxTotalMergeKeys does not limit CPU use for empty merge sources
CVE-2026-84375 / GHSA-2883-xcg3-v3hh
More information
Details
Summary
maxTotalMergeKeysdoes not count empty mappings. An attacker can repeatedly merge a large sequence of them and consume significant CPU without reaching the configured limit.Example
For every target, the loader iterates all
Nelements ofarr. This results inO(N * K)work whiletotalMergeKeysremains unchanged.PoC
Observed results:
Impact
An attacker can submit a relatively small YAML document that causes prolonged CPU consumption despite the default
maxTotalMergeKeyslimit.Fix
Count each merge-source mapping as one budget unit, in addition to counting its keys.
Difference with v5
In v3 & v4, merge is enabled by default. So, the severity score is higher.
Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HReferences
This data is provided by OSV and the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
Prototype pollution in webpack loader-utils
CVE-2022-37601 / GHSA-76p3-8jx3-jpfq
More information
Details
Prototype pollution vulnerability in function parseQuery in parseQuery.js in webpack loader-utils prior to version 2.0.3 via the name variable in parseQuery.js.
Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HReferences