feat(bdd): unify rust image versions to slim-trixie

[slbotbm]

Changes rust-based images to slim-trixie version.

As an aside, there are a variety of versions (bookworm, bookworm-slim, trixie, trixie-slim, alpine) being used throughout the repo. Maybe it would be better to choose one version and utilize that everywhere?

[github-actions]

Thanks for the PR. It is labeled S-waiting-on-review and queued for review.

Slash commands (own line, regular comment) move it around the queue:

• /ready - back to S-waiting-on-review after addressing feedback
• /author - flip to S-waiting-on-author while you finish changes
• /request-review @user-or-team - request a reviewer

See CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

[hubcio]

do you think that it woudl be worth to add some machinery that would sync / check if its synced? maybe either reuse sync-rustc-version.sh or a new script

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 48.25%. Comparing base (8c1fefb) to head (4002413).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #3569       +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage     74.02%   48.25%   -25.77%     
  Complexity      937      937               
=============================================
  Files          1247     1246        -1     
  Lines        127567   111705    -15862     
  Branches     103436    87618    -15818     
=============================================
- Hits          94427    53907    -40520     
- Misses        30104    54997    +24893     
+ Partials       3036     2801      -235     

Components	Coverage Δ
Rust Core	41.58% <ø> (-33.09%)	⬇️
Java SDK	62.44% <ø> (ø)
C# SDK	71.40% <ø> (-0.71%)	⬇️
Python SDK	88.88% <ø> (ø)
PHP SDK	84.29% <ø> (ø)
Node SDK	91.35% <ø> (+0.12%)	⬆️
Go SDK	40.14% <ø> (ø)
see 359 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[slbotbm]

/ready

[mmodzelewski]

this version does not exists, you can use 3.10-trixie instead

[slbotbm]

To be honest, I was wondering whether a dev container is really required for python? This is the only folder that has a dev container, as far as I can tell, and currently, we use uv to manage all python versions and dependencies. I was thinking it would be better to delete this. What do you think?

[mmodzelewski]

I haven't used it for a while now, not sure if anyone else is using it. Yeah, with uv that should be easier anyway than when I created this dev container. Anyways, I'm OK with dropping it

[mmodzelewski]

I think this file got stale, and it's no longer in use and can be removed. The docker-compose files reference Dockerfile from core/server directly. @hubcio correct me if I'm wrong
Otherwise, switching from alpine to debian would require some commands changes.

[mmodzelewski]

/author