Skip to content

docs: document createAdditional account selection#1411

Merged
jakehobbs merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
jake/docs-createadditional-account-type
Jun 26, 2026
Merged

docs: document createAdditional account selection#1411
jakehobbs merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
jake/docs-createadditional-account-type

Conversation

@jakehobbs

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Clarifies how wallet_requestAccount handles creationHint.accountType for existing signer accounts and when createAdditional should be used.

Related Issues

None.

Changes Made

  • Added a Supported account types subsection explaining existing-account resolution behavior.
  • Added a createAdditional JSON example and an API-tab note for exact account type requests.

Testing

  • I have tested these changes locally (pnpm exec prettier --check content/wallets/pages/transactions/using-eip-7702/index.mdx, git diff --check)
  • I have run the validation scripts (pnpm run validate)
  • I have checked that the documentation builds correctly

🤖 Generated with Codex

Document how Wallet APIs preserve existing accounts by default and when teams should opt into createAdditional for exact account type requests.

Co-Authored-By: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔗 Preview Mode

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
Alchemy Docs ✅ Ready 🔗 Visit Preview Jun 26, 2026, 9:31 PM

@jakehobbs jakehobbs changed the title Document createAdditional account selection docs: document createAdditional account selection Jun 26, 2026
@jakehobbs jakehobbs requested a review from avarobinson June 26, 2026 21:33
@jakehobbs jakehobbs merged commit 414b733 into main Jun 26, 2026
10 checks passed
@jakehobbs jakehobbs deleted the jake/docs-createadditional-account-type branch June 26, 2026 21:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants