Drop the SDK into your Python agent, define what "good" means, and get a shareable proof report.
pip install agentsproofWorks with any Python agent — OpenAI, Anthropic, LangChain, CrewAI, or plain functions.
import os
from agentsproof import AgentsProof
ap = AgentsProof(api_key=os.environ["AGENTSPROOF_API_KEY"])
def run_my_agent(user_query: str):
run = ap.start_run(
project_slug="my-coding-agent",
label="Answer coding question",
input={"query": user_query},
goal="Search the web for relevant docs and return a working code solution",
)
plan = run.trace("llm_call", "gpt-4o", lambda: openai_call(user_query), input=user_query)
results = run.trace("tool_call", "web_search", lambda: web_search(plan))
final_answer = run.trace("llm_call", "gpt-4o", lambda: openai_call(results))
result = run.complete({"answer": final_answer})
print(f"Report: {result['publicUrl']}")
# → https://agentsproof.dev/r/abc123import asyncio, os
from agentsproof import AgentsProof
ap = AgentsProof(api_key=os.environ["AGENTSPROOF_API_KEY"])
async def run_my_agent(user_query: str):
run = ap.start_run(
project_slug="my-coding-agent",
input={"query": user_query},
goal="Return a working code solution",
)
plan = await run.atrace("llm_call", "gpt-4o", lambda: async_openai_call(user_query))
results = await run.atrace("tool_call", "web_search", lambda: async_web_search(plan))
final_answer = await run.atrace("llm_call", "gpt-4o", lambda: async_openai_call(results))
result = await run.acomplete({"answer": final_answer})
print(f"Report: {result['publicUrl']}")
asyncio.run(run_my_agent("How do I reverse a list in Python?"))Pass golden_id to use a Golden as the eval context. The Golden's input, goal, and expected_output fill in automatically as defaults — any field you also provide explicitly takes precedence. The Golden's success_criteria, trace_assertions, failure_modes, and expected_behavior are applied at grading time with no extra work.
run = ap.start_run(
project_slug="my-coding-agent",
golden_id="abc-123", # all Golden context loaded automatically
label="Ad-hoc run against Golden",
# input is optional — auto-filled from the Golden when omitted
)
result = my_agent(run)
run.complete(result)Supply the full eval context directly to start_run() without creating a Golden in the dashboard. Useful for one-off runs or CI scripts.
run = ap.start_run(
project_slug="my-coding-agent",
input={"query": user_query},
goal="Return a working TypeScript solution.",
success_criteria=[
"Returns syntactically valid TypeScript",
"Handles the null / empty-array case",
],
trace_assertions=["max_steps:5", "must_call:web_search"],
failure_modes=["hallucinated_api", "missing_null_check"],
expected_behavior="Agent searches docs, then writes a solution with a null guard.",
)import os
from agentsproof import AgentsProof
ap = AgentsProof(api_key=os.environ["AGENTSPROOF_API_KEY"])
def handler(input, ctx):
run = ctx.start_run()
result = my_agent(input)
run.complete({"answer": result})
result = ap.run_proof_suite(
project_slug="my-coding-agent",
suite_slug="core-behaviors",
handler=handler,
)
print(result)
# → {"passedCases": 17, "failedCases": 1, "overallScore": 0.91, "publicUrl": "..."}async def async_handler(input, ctx):
run = ctx.start_run()
result = await my_async_agent(input)
await run.acomplete({"answer": result})
result = await ap.arun_proof_suite(
project_slug="my-coding-agent",
suite_slug="core-behaviors",
handler=async_handler,
)Create a client. Get your API key from agentsproof.dev.
| Param | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
project_slug |
str |
yes | Your project identifier |
input |
Any |
yes¹ | The initial input or prompt to the agent |
golden_id |
str |
no | ID of an existing Golden. Loads its input, goal, expected_output, success_criteria, trace_assertions, failure_modes, and expected_behavior automatically. Explicit params override Golden defaults. |
label |
str |
no | Human-readable label shown in the dashboard run list |
goal |
str |
no | What this run should accomplish. Drives goal_completion scoring. |
expected_output |
Any |
no | Reference output. Grader compares actual output against this for output_quality scoring. |
expected_behavior |
str |
no | Step-by-step description of a correct execution. Informs all 5 grading axes. |
success_criteria |
list[str] |
no | Explicit checklist evaluated one-for-one in criteria_results. Overrides LLM-inferred criteria from goal. |
trace_assertions |
list[str] |
no | Deterministic assertions: must_call:<name>, must_not_call:<name>, max_steps:<n>, min_steps:<n>. Free-text entries are sent to the LLM grader as extra criteria. |
failure_modes |
list[str] |
no | Known bad outcomes. Grader penalises runs where these are observed. |
metadata |
dict |
no | Arbitrary key/value pairs for filtering and grouping in the dashboard. |
¹
inputis required unlessgolden_idis provided, in which case the Golden's input is used as the default.
Wrap a sync callable and auto-log it as a step with latency captured.
Wrap a sync or async callable. Use in async agent code.
Token count and cost are captured automatically in priority order:
extract— your own callable, receives the step output, returns{"token_count": int, "cost_usd": float}(both optional).- Auto-detection — the SDK sniffs
output.usage(oroutput["usage"]) for Anthropic (input_tokens + output_tokens) and OpenAI-compatible (total_tokensorprompt_tokens + completion_tokens) shapes. - null — if neither works, both fields are omitted.
# Anthropic / OpenAI — auto-detected, no extra code needed
result = run.trace("llm_call", "claude", lambda: anthropic_call(prompt))
# Any other provider — supply an extractor
result = run.trace(
"llm_call", "my-model",
lambda: call_my_llm(prompt),
input=prompt,
extract=lambda out: {"token_count": out.usage.tokens, "cost_usd": out.billed_usd},
)Manually log a step without wrapping a function. Step types: llm_call | tool_call | tool_result | memory_read | memory_write.
Finish the run, trigger grading, and get back the public report URL.
Async version of complete().
Run approved Goldens locally against your agent. AgentsProof never executes user code remotely.
The SDK never raises on logging failures — steps are fire-and-forget so the SDK cannot crash your agent.
Each run is automatically scored on 5 axes:
| Axis | Weight | What it measures |
|---|---|---|
| Goal completion | 35% | Did the agent achieve the stated goal? |
| Output quality | 20% | Is the final output correct and complete? |
| Tool accuracy | 20% | Were tool calls well-formed and necessary? |
| Step efficiency | 15% | Did it avoid redundant steps or loops? |
| Safety | 10% | Did it avoid unsafe or off-policy actions? |
Weights adjust automatically — if your agent makes no tool calls, tool_accuracy weight is redistributed to goal_completion and output_quality.
criteria_results — how the checklist is populated:
| What you provide | What the grader receives | Result |
|---|---|---|
success_criteria=[...] (from Golden or directly) |
Explicit bullet list | One pass/fail entry per criterion |
goal only (no success_criteria) |
Free-text goal prose | Grader infers its own criteria from the goal text |
| Neither | Nothing | criteria_results is empty |
trace_assertions — structured patterns (must_call:*, max_steps:*, etc.) are evaluated deterministically before the LLM runs. Free-text entries are passed to the LLM grader as additional criteria.
Providing a goal always improves accuracy. Without it, the grader infers intent from the raw input alone.
Every report includes per-axis reasoning text and a criteria_results checklist so the score is always explainable.