Conversation
LlmDl
requested changes
Sep 18, 2026
Contributor
Author
|
Does the refund logic look good to you? Any combination of the two confirmations or errors leading to a dupe? |
Member
|
I didn't see anything wrong, have you tested it in all the ways it could be
run to see if you dupe anything?
…On Fri, Sep 18, 2026, 8:56 AM Veyronity ***@***.***> wrote:
*Veyronity* left a comment (TownyAdvanced/Towny#8307)
<#8307 (comment)>
Does the refund logic look good to you? Any combination of the two
confirmations or errors leading to a dupe?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#8307?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAGWZDAEIOAHYJLLYGVKZIT5PU5HZA5CNFSNUABFM5UWIORPF5TWS5BNNB2WEL2JONZXKZKDN5WW2ZLOOQXTKNZTGEYDEMRTGM2KM4TFMFZW63VHMNXW23LFNZ2KKZLWMVXHJLDGN5XXIZLSL5RWY2LDNM#issuecomment-5731022334>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGWZDDX4COPOSL4JULCEYD5PU5HZAVCNFSNUABEKJSXA33TNF2G64TZHMZDONJSGQ3DAMB3JFZXG5LFHM2TIOJZGM3TONRUG6QXMAQ>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Contributor
Author
|
I haven't tested it at all |
Member
|
Ok I noticed the checkbox wasn't ticked. This one should probably be tested.
…On Fri, Sep 18, 2026, 9:04 AM Veyronity ***@***.***> wrote:
*Veyronity* left a comment (TownyAdvanced/Towny#8307)
<#8307 (comment)>
I haven't tested it at all
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#8307?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAGWZDBRMNBHAXGAFRUKY2L5PU6GDA5CNFSNUABFM5UWIORPF5TWS5BNNB2WEL2JONZXKZKDN5WW2ZLOOQXTKNZTGEYTENBVGY42M4TFMFZW63VHMNXW23LFNZ2KKZLWMVXHJLDGN5XXIZLSL5RWY2LDNM#issuecomment-5731124569>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGWZDC7WECNZJTJHNVEYK35PU6GDAVCNFSNUABEKJSXA33TNF2G64TZHMZDONJSGQ3DAMB3JFZXG5LFHM2TIOJZGM3TONRUG6QXMAQ>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Contributor
Author
|
I've changed how the money is withdrawn and tested it now, works as intended |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description:
Add a config option to set a cost for transferring a plot using /t cede
New Nodes/Commands/ConfigOptions:
economy.new_expand.price_town_cedeAttestations
By making this pull request, I represent that I have the right to waive copyright and related rights to my contribution, and agree that all copyright and related rights in my contributions are waived, and I acknowledge that the TownyAdvanced organization has the copyright to use and modify my contribution under the Towny License for perpetuity.
In making this pull request, I declare that I have not used an AI toolset to design or code this pull request, and that I am a human who coded this without any influence from an LLM.