Skip to content

Search conversation topics with title and participant priority - #676

Merged
witbrock merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/von-fd047997bb04fe22
Sep 13, 2026
Merged

Search conversation topics with title and participant priority#676
witbrock merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/von-fd047997bb04fe22

Conversation

@witbrock

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The Conversations field previously filtered only loaded titles and participant IDs. It now combines those matches (including participant names) with the existing embedding-backed chat-content search. Title/participant matches always precede content-only results, including across API pagination; search results bypass the tray's recency and pin ordering. Typing is debounced, stale query/context responses are discarded, and failures preserve metadata matches with a retry.

Native task: #V#task_agent_826a47c8faa2c0c77e8e24d3b568375c.

Validation: 24 backend service/API tests and 15 frontend tests passed; changed-JavaScript static checks and diff checks passed. tests/browser/conversationTopicSearch.cjs passed in Chromium against the candidate catalogue module with synthetic API replies, checking metadata precedence, an old unloaded topic match, query clearing and draft retention. This is fixture evidence, not live embedding-quality or authenticated production acceptance.

The existing chat RAG index is reused; no migration or backfill was run. Message-exchange bodies are outside that index and retain loaded title/participant matching. Existing 500-conversation/10-owner retrieval bounds, index coverage, backfill routes and performance considerations are documented. No deployment requested. No secrets or runtime data committed.

Merge decision: ready for this bounded catalogue-to-chat-search integration; live index completeness remains unverified and is surfaced in the UI.

@witbrock
witbrock merged commit d9ac13e into main Sep 13, 2026
2 checks passed
@witbrock
witbrock deleted the codex/von-fd047997bb04fe22 branch September 13, 2026 17:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant