Repair downstream turn progress and recovery - #355
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Why
Recent real-path replay work exposed downstream reliability defects after durable workflow submission: active progress could expire, nested diagnostics could remain compacted, recovery guidance could consume another long observation interval, and the useful pending answer could be replaced by a generic finality fallback.
The repair is generic support code. It adds no Gmail-, arXiv-, user-, workflow-ID-, or prompt-specific route.
Impact
Long-running authorised work remains observable and can return an honest pending result with a precise recovery handle. Diagnostic readers receive the full nested payload, while effect finality and canonical read-back requirements remain intact.
Validation
git diff --checkpassed