Add action-based analytical power modeling - #104
Open
YuxuanHan0326 wants to merge 4 commits into
Open
Conversation
Compare dense and routed-MoE detailed schedules with affine summaries across opcode counts, DMA multiplicity, compute timing, HBM service, physical traffic, and action energy.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds an action-based analytical power model on top of compiler CostTrace and HBM V4 traffic.
Main changes
Validation
Dependencies
This is a stacked PR. Its base is the analytical-latency branch so reviewers initially see only the Power changes.
Scope
This model excludes multi-chip links, package, cooling, CTS, SRAM leakage, and signoff-level physical effects.