Skip to content

User experience of Url::join is surprising #1129

Description

@schneems

The name "join" implies an addition to the existing URL, while the API https://docs.rs/url/latest/url/struct.Url.html#method.join will replace/reduce the original url. I find this behavior to be surprising:

let base = Url::parse("https://alice.com/a")?;
let url = base.join("//eve.com/b")?;
assert_eq!(url.as_str(), "https://eve.com/b")

let base = Url::parse("https://alice.com/a")?;
let url = base.join("/v1/meta")?;
assert_eq!(url.as_str(), "https://alice.com/v1/meta");

The behavior I want when reaching for a "join" api is best represented by the mutable push syntax:

url.path_segments_mut()
    .expect("valid base URL")
    .push(base_image.name())
    .push(&tgz_name);

However. Even having written similar code many times. I still sometimes accidentally use Url::join by habit, as coming from other languages such as Ruby's File.join, and when I didn't carefully consider one of the variants of inputs, I have to spend significant time debugging to figure out why the program doesn't behave the way I anticipated/expected.

Suggestions

The above isn't really a bug as the code is behaving as expected/documented. But the user experience of the API is quite difficult; it requires the developer to consider all possible variants when using it. Things like prepending a slash to a path in code might be common, and a change to the input might have it already have a slash, and then suddenly the behavior of the join call changes (as there would be two slashes).

As this API has been around for a long time, I don't suggest changing the behavior, as that would break existing code. However, possibly deprecating the function to guard against accidental use could be an option.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions