You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As a result, a path containing only JSX-slot intent can reach the No planning intent defined failure. A path combining authoritative content and JSX-slot intent can also be classified using only the authoritative branch even though later projection includes composition operations.
Why does this matter?
flowchart TD
J[JSX-slot contribution] --> C[compiled planning path]
C --> H{has compositions?}
H -->|JSX slots omitted| N[No planning intent]
H -->|other TS operations| P[planned composition]
style N stroke:#dc2626,stroke-width:2px
Loading
JSX slots are catalog contribution behavior, not an optional internal optimization. A supported contribution should produce a predictable Plan whether the target file is seeded, already exists, or is contributed authoritatively in the same Blueprint.
This issue should establish the expected behavior first. It should not assume that the existing wide planning-intent representation must remain.
Scope
JSX-slot-only contributions.
JSX slots applied to an existing target file.
JSX slots applied when a seed or authoritative file contribution is present.
Missing composition targets and malformed slot markers.
Multiple compatible or conflicting JSX-slot contributions for one path.
Acceptance criteria
A JSX-slot-only contribution produces a deliberate Plan outcome rather than No planning intent defined.
Planning behavior is covered for missing, existing, and seeded target files.
Authoritative content combined with a JSX-slot contribution preserves both intents in the resulting Plan behavior.
Missing or incompatible JSX composition targets produce explicit conflict or failure information.
Repeated planning and applying of the same JSX-slot contribution is deterministic and idempotent.
Focused tests document the supported JSX-slot scenarios without relying only on large Plan fixtures.
What problem are we solving?
The planning compiler recognizes JSX-slot contributions and the assessor can emit JSX composition operations:
But the check that decides whether a planning path contains composition work omits JSX slots:
As a result, a path containing only JSX-slot intent can reach the
No planning intent definedfailure. A path combining authoritative content and JSX-slot intent can also be classified using only the authoritative branch even though later projection includes composition operations.Why does this matter?
flowchart TD J[JSX-slot contribution] --> C[compiled planning path] C --> H{has compositions?} H -->|JSX slots omitted| N[No planning intent] H -->|other TS operations| P[planned composition] style N stroke:#dc2626,stroke-width:2pxJSX slots are catalog contribution behavior, not an optional internal optimization. A supported contribution should produce a predictable Plan whether the target file is seeded, already exists, or is contributed authoritatively in the same Blueprint.
This issue should establish the expected behavior first. It should not assume that the existing wide planning-intent representation must remain.
Scope
Acceptance criteria
No planning intent defined.Blocked by
None - can start immediately.