Skip to content

[v3] Add prerequisites 3/6 #984

Open

Description

@TomPradat

⚠️ If you have issues / are unsure, create ONE PR PER EXERCISE so it's easier to merge them as we can have discussions per exercise. If you're certain, it's fine to do a single one.

The idea is to split #960 into smaller chunks.

Here is the list of practices exercises to deal with for this part :

anagram

acronym

high-scores

isogram

matching-brackets

phone-number

scale-generator

series

largest-series-product

transpose

grep

rectangles

spiral-matrix

ocr-numbers

saddle-points

forth

food-chain

house

isbn-verifier

pig-latin

Activity

  1. AnishDe12020 commented on Dec 2, 2021

    @AnishDe12020
    Contributor

    I am willing to take this issue up (at least some of the exercises). Just let me know if I should make the PRs, one for each exercises, one for a batch of exercises or one for all of them.

  2. TomPradat commented on Dec 2, 2021

    @TomPradat
    ContributorAuthor

    I'd suggest that you make a PR for each exercise but if you feel like you want to do a lot of exercises you can take 4-5 by PR.

    Trying to do all of them at once is not a good idea IMO, it's indigestible for both you and the reviewer.

    Idk if this might help but here are the steps I used when doing some :

    1 - Doing/trying the exercise
    2 - Looking at the exercise's proof of work
    3 - Looking at the submitted solutions.
    4 - Adding the prerequisites

  3. junedev commented on Dec 2, 2021

    @junedev
    Member

    Good advice from @TomPradat there. I am in favor of a batch of max. 5 exercises per PR.

  4. AnishDe12020 commented on Dec 2, 2021

    @AnishDe12020
    Contributor

    I'd suggest that you make a PR for each exercise but if you feel like you want to do a lot of exercises you can take 4-5 by PR.

    Trying to do all of them at once is not a good idea IMO, it's indigestible for both you and the reviewer.

    Idk if this might help but here are the steps I used when doing some :

    1 - Doing/trying the exercise 2 - Looking at the exercise's proof of work 3 - Looking at the submitted solutions. 4 - Adding the prerequisites

    Sounds good to me

  5. TomPradat commented on Oct 25, 2022

    @TomPradat
    ContributorAuthor

    Here is an updated list (25/10/2022) :

    • matching-brackets

    • scale-generator

    • series

    • largest-series-product

    • transpose

    • grep

    • rectangles

    • spiral-matrix

    • ocr-numbers

    • saddle-points

    • forth

    • food-chain

    • house

    • isbn-verifier

    • pig-latin

  6. safwansamsudeen commented on Apr 14, 2023

    @safwansamsudeen
    Contributor

    Is this still open? Would love to work on it if it is!

  7. TomPradat commented on Apr 14, 2023

    @TomPradat
    ContributorAuthor

    @safwansamsudeen Yes ! See #984 (comment) for suggestions on how to do it. Let me know if you have any questions

  8. junedev commented on Apr 15, 2023

    @junedev
    Member

    @safwansamsudeen If you work on this, please start out with a small batch, e.g. 3 exercises max.
    Add a GitHub comment for each one explaining which solution you had in mind when selecting the concepts you listed. Maybe paste a link to a community solution or paste some code. This is the only way the PR becomes reviewable. Without this, the reviewer needs to do the exact work you did to come up with the list again to verify it makes sense.

  9. junedev commented on Apr 15, 2023

    @junedev
    Member

    @TomPradat Please keep this in mind https://exercism.org/blog/freeing-our-maintainers and that neither JD not me are currently actively maintaining this repo. Only encourage community contributions if you are confident that you have the time to properly review them when they come in. Otherwise it will be a frustrating experience for everyone.

  10. safwansamsudeen commented on Apr 29, 2023

    @safwansamsudeen
    Contributor

    @junedev I'm new to both OSS and Exercism, so I think I'll start off with one exercise per PR.

    @TomPradat, I've currently opened a PR - #2159 - for the House exercise. Let me know how it goes!

  11. TomPradat commented on May 10, 2023

    @TomPradat
    ContributorAuthor

    @safwansamsudeen I'll have a look next week when I have a bit more time 👍

  12. safwansamsudeen commented on May 31, 2023

    @safwansamsudeen
    Contributor

    @TomPradat, just a reminder about the PR.

  13. quintuple-mallard commented on Jun 11, 2025

    @quintuple-mallard
    Member

    Is this still available? I'd really like to work on it if it is, it seems like a good first contribution.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    chore 🔧Meta related task such as build, test, linting, maintainers.json etc.help wantedv3-migration 🤖Preparing for Exercism v3x:action/improveImprove existing functionality/contentx:knowledge/elementaryLittle Exercism knowledge requiredx:size/mediumMedium amount of workx:type/contentWork on content (e.g. exercises, concepts)

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions