From 80f1fa27262b32a838d02225f196bc41ccf58c0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Roth <daroth@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 14:04:04 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [release-notes] C# in .NET 11 Preview 6

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
---
 release-notes/11.0/preview/preview6/csharp.md | 65 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 release-notes/11.0/preview/preview6/csharp.md

diff --git a/release-notes/11.0/preview/preview6/csharp.md b/release-notes/11.0/preview/preview6/csharp.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..cd90917890
--- /dev/null
+++ b/release-notes/11.0/preview/preview6/csharp.md
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+<!-- Verified by compiling against the .NET 11 Preview 6 SDK (11.0.100-preview.6) with LangVersion=preview -->
+# C# in .NET 11 Preview 6 - Release Notes
+
+.NET 11 Preview 6 includes the following C# language and compiler updates:
+
+- [Extension indexers](#extension-indexers)
+- [Unions ship their support types in the box](#unions-ship-their-support-types-in-the-box)
+
+C# updates:
+
+- [What's new in C# 15](https://learn.microsoft.com/dotnet/csharp/whats-new/csharp-15)
+
+## Extension indexers
+
+Extension members now include **indexers**, so you can add `this[...]` access to a type from an `extension` block ([dotnet/roslyn #81607](https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/pull/81607)). This rounds out the extension members feature introduced in .NET 10, which already supported extension methods and properties.
+
+An extension indexer is declared like an instance indexer inside an `extension` block. The following example adds from-the-end indexing to `IReadOnlyList<T>`, which defines `this[int]` but not `this[Index]`:
+
+```csharp
+using System;
+using System.Collections.Generic;
+
+IReadOnlyList<string> log = ["start", "work", "done"];
+
+Console.WriteLine(log[^1]);   // done
+Console.WriteLine(log[^2]);   // work
+
+public static class ReadOnlyListExtensions
+{
+    extension<T>(IReadOnlyList<T> list)
+    {
+        public T this[Index index] => list[index.GetOffset(list.Count)];
+    }
+}
+```
+
+Extension indexers follow the same resolution rules as other extension members: they're only considered when no applicable instance indexer is found. They support multiple parameters, `get`/`set` accessors, and work in list patterns. Extension indexers remain a preview feature, so enable `<LangVersion>preview</LangVersion>` to use them.
+
+## Unions ship their support types in the box
+
+Preview 5 introduced `union` declarations and union patterns, but projects had to hand-author the compiler support types (`UnionAttribute` and `IUnion`). In Preview 6, those types ship in the framework as `System.Runtime.CompilerServices.UnionAttribute` and `System.Runtime.CompilerServices.IUnion`, so a `union` now compiles with no extra boilerplate:
+
+```csharp
+public record class Dog(string Name);
+public record class Cat(int Lives);
+
+public union Pet(Dog, Cat);
+
+static string Describe(Pet pet) => pet switch
+{
+    Dog(var name) => $"dog: {name}",
+    Cat(var lives) => $"cat: {lives}"
+};
+```
+
+`System.Text.Json` now serializes union values, writing the active case directly ([dotnet/runtime #128162](https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/pull/128162)). Serializing a `Pet` that holds a `Dog("Rex")` produces `{"Name":"Rex"}`. See the [.NET Libraries release notes](./libraries.md) for the serialization details and the [ASP.NET Core release notes](./aspnetcore.md) for how unions appear in OpenAPI documents.
+
+Preview 6 also refines the language rules for unions:
+
+- A `union` declaration can use a non-public constructor that takes a single parameter ([dotnet/roslyn #83788](https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/pull/83788)).
+- A `not` pattern applies to the incoming union value rather than its contained value ([dotnet/roslyn #83904](https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/pull/83904)).
+- Custom union types support inheritance of their generated `Create` methods ([dotnet/roslyn #83991](https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/pull/83991)).
+- The compiler reports a clear error when a custom `union` declaration is missing the minimal set of required APIs ([dotnet/roslyn #83813](https://github.com/dotnet/roslyn/pull/83813)).
+
+Unions remain a preview feature; enable `<LangVersion>preview</LangVersion>` to try them, and expect the surface to keep evolving before the feature ships.