Skip to content

Pipeline operator #65

Description

@bathos

I’d like to handle this syntax soon because while the proposal remains at stage 1, it has had enduring traction in the community and it is currently seeking feedback based on developer usage via Babel.

The tricky bit is that the proposal has two forms, each with different syntax. I believe it should be possible to handle the ‘union’ of the two grammars, but will need to investigate more.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions